[v3] LWG 2106: move_iterator::reference

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 6 March 2014 09:35, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
> Agreed. I remember being sloppy about issues not relative to a released
> Standard.

Yes, if it's just a change from one draft to another then it's just
"work in progress" and  not important to record that we've applied a
resolution.

> Well, in fact we also used to keep
>
>     http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bugs.html
>
> up to date...

Oh yes, I've definitely not been doing that!