[v3] LWG 2106: move_iterator::reference

[Paolo Carlini]

Hi,

On 03/05/2014 10:47 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 5 March 2014 21:35, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>>> Please put _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_DEFECTS (or whatever
>>> it is we use elsewhere) in the comment, rather than just "DR 2106". I
>>> think the point of that is to be able to grep for all DR fixes
>>> (especially ones that aren't actually accepted as defects yet :-)
>>
>> Believe it or not, I did look at other occurences in the code, and didn't
>> hit any that used such a keyword. Now that I know to look for it, there is
>> indeed _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS (I'll add it), but it is missing in a
>> lot of places.
> That's the one. I know I've not always been consistent about adding
> it, but I try to when I remember.
Agreed. I remember being sloppy about issues not relative to a released 
Standard. Well, in fact we also used to keep

     http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/bugs.html

up to date...

Paolo.