your patch broke darwin libffi

[Bryce McKinlay]

David Edelsohn wrote:

>>>>>>Bryce McKinlay writes:
>>>>>>
>
>Bryce> Wouldn't it be better to give this function the same name in both aix.S 
>Bryce> and darwin.S, since only one of them gets built?
>
>	I was trying to add the support with as little intrusion as
>necessary while utilizing the similarities.  Darwin is not AIX and AIX is
>not Darwin.  What name would you suggest?  During our last discussion, no
>one could find a common name.
>

I don't see any reason why the platform/ABI name has to be in the 
function name. How about simply ffi_call_inner or ffi_call_asm?

regards

Bryce.