Backport fix for BZ #18928?

[Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho]

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:

> Yes, but "- Send committed patch to libc-stable."
>
> I don't think libc-alpha needs to be involved in non-master work.
>
> The point of the libc-stable list is to discuss stable backports
> and for interested parties to track posted patches to stable branches.

So, looks like I misinterpreted this wiki page [1]:
"libc-stable (Stable backport discussions only, send patches to libc-alpha)"

Which I just rewrote as:
"libc-stable (Discussions around stable branches and backported patches only.
Send new patches to libc-alpha)"

[1] https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist?highlight=%28libc-stable%29

Thanks again,

-- 
Tulio Magno