Backport fix for BZ #18928?

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 12/17/2015 01:34 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> On 12/17/2015 12:15 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote:
>>>> We bump the subversion to 2 to give a demarcation point where the feature changed
>>>> in an important backwards-incompatible way.
>>>
>>> Could we do that for all the other stable branches as well?
>>
>> I withdraw my suggestions.
>>
>> All you need to do is:
>>
>> - Cherry pick the commit.
>> - Add your bugs to the NEWS file.
>> - Adjust Changlog.
>> - Commit.
> 
>  - Send committed patch to libc-alpha.

Yes, but "- Send committed patch to libc-stable."

I don't think libc-alpha needs to be involved in non-master work.

The point of the libc-stable list is to discuss stable backports
and for interested parties to track posted patches to stable branches.

Cheers,
Carlos.