Possible glibc 2.35 ARM regression in LD_BIND_NOT

[Nathan Nye]

+Adhemerval

Hi Adhemerval,

I think you may know the relevant source best if this issue exists. Your 
feedback would be really valuable if you're able to test it.

Very respectfully,
Nathan Nye

On 7/4/22 3:14 PM, Nathan Nye wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I'm reviewing what could be a regression in LD_BIND_NOT's 
> functionality in glibc 2.35 on ARM architectures (there were a few 
> recent ARM audit changes). Symbol binding only occurs a single time on 
> glibc 2.35/ARM, even when LD_BIND_NOT is enabled. I've tested:
>
>   * Ubuntu 22.04 x86_64 glibc 2.35
>   * Ubuntu 20.04 ARM glibc 2.34
>   * Ubuntu 22.04 ARM glibc 2.35
>
> I could use a second pair of eyes on this issue to verify it exists. 
> Here is the test case I cobbled together, please excuse the poor C 
> code I wrote while testing: https://pastebin.com/raw/HSSYjemj
>
> I've also attached the test case to this email. Thanks!
>
> Very respectfully,
> Nathan Nye

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xCB7269934F16882E.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 660 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-help/attachments/20220704/ac986798/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-help/attachments/20220704/ac986798/attachment.sig>