Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3

[Roland McGrath]

> Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
> 
> |> On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:47, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> |> > +compat_symbol (libc, __umoddi3, __umoddi3, GLIBC_2_0);
> |> 
> |> Shouldn't that be GLIBC_2.0 (. not _)?
> 
> No, this must be a valid identifier, which is translated via
> abi-versions.h into the actual version (which might not be GLIBC_2.0 after
> all).  It's a wrapper around symbol_version.
> 
> |> I also wonder why you didn't wrap it with a SHLIB_COMPAT?
> 
> I'm not sure whether it is needed.

If you don't use SHLIB_COMPAT, you will compile in unexported dead code on
a configuration that doesn't need to support GLIBC_2.0.