Hide __[u]{div,mod}di3
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Mon Jan 27 21:28:00 GMT 2003
Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
|> On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:47, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > +compat_symbol (libc, __umoddi3, __umoddi3, GLIBC_2_0);
|>
|> Shouldn't that be GLIBC_2.0 (. not _)?
No, this must be a valid identifier, which is translated via
abi-versions.h into the actual version (which might not be GLIBC_2.0 after
all). It's a wrapper around symbol_version.
|> I also wonder why you didn't wrap it with a SHLIB_COMPAT?
I'm not sure whether it is needed.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-hacker
mailing list