Meeting Minutes - Office Hours for CTI - 2026-08-28
Joseph Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
Tue Sep 8 21:33:42 GMT 2026
On Tue, 8 Sep 2026, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Our current voluntary hosting arrangements listen to and participate in
> the community. If we want to try something out, they're normally happy
> to lend us a hand and make it happen.
>
> A professional hosting arrangement will involve a professional
> relationship, in which only designated parties will be able to submit
> requests in order to have them as much as listened to.
>
> This is not AT ALL in the best interest of the community.
As far as possible, configuration changes for production infrastructure
*should* be slow and carefully considered, rather than just happening
because one community member thought a change was a good idea and one
hosting person then implemented it, possibly disrupting things for other
people, deviating from a previous community consensus or introducing a
security vulnerability.
The current hosting arrangements also have their own variant of the
"synchronous meeting" problem - unless you happen to be on #overseers at
the time a particular change gets suggested, discussed and implemented,
you never know about the change or have a chance to give input until you
see it break something. I think a slower, more formal system can *also*
have better community input than at present by moving as many discussions
of hosting changes as possible to libc-alpha - after, of course, there is
better isolation of infrastructure so it's genuinely possible for glibc to
decide what's wanted independently of other projects currently hosted on
the same system.
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list