Working together and gaining trust
Joseph Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
Wed Feb 18 18:43:00 GMT 2026
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2026, Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > The relevant criteria for GNU package hosting are the GNU ethical
> > repository criteria
>
> Focus on hosting of software repositories, that's publishing and
> therefore non-SaaSS.
The active proposal for glibc is about repository and mailing list
hosting. This makes all the SaaSS discussion irrelevant to that proposal.
All CI run in glibc development is particular people choosing to run CI
for configurations they care about, and is their own computing, not the
glibc project's computing and not SaaSS (and we don't have any proposal
for moving such CI).
> > All the other lengthy discussion about SaaSS philosophy in general seems
> > offtopic for libc-alpha to me
>
> It's free software philosophy; SaaSS is just one of the means to deny
> users the essential freedoms they deserve and need to control their
> computing.
>
> It's very concerning that you seem so willing to dismiss a key element
> of free software philosophy, and so ready to give up our collective
> freedoms.
I'm not dismissing it, I'm redirecting the discussions of it to more
appropriate locations. The GNU project has different mailing lists for
discussion of different topics. gnu-misc-discuss is the GNU project
location for discussion of philosophical issues, and discussions about the
development of glibc are offtopic there. libc-alpha is the GNU project
location for discussions related to development of glibc, and general
philosophical discussions are offtopic there. We don't have active
proposals for more use of the Sourceware forge for glibc, but for anything
about the forge in general, it also has its own mailing list, where
discussions of the forge not relating to more specific uses for a specific
project would be appropriate.
--
Joseph S. Myers
josmyers@redhat.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list