[PATCH] nss: Group merge does not react to ERANGE during merge (bug 33361)
Florian Weimer
fw@deneb.enyo.de
Fri Sep 12 05:44:04 GMT 2025
* Collin Funk:
> The existing code seems unintentional, since the status would likely
> (certainly?) be overwritten by another call to DL_CALL_FCT. Is that what
> the user experienced?
I assume you mean the service module function, not DL_CALL_FCT (which
just a wrapper for profiling accounting, usually a no-op).
Yes, if the loop iterates once more, than the status gets overwritten,
and the caller (eventually, the application) does not see the ERANGE.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list