[PATCH] nss: Group merge does not react to ERANGE during merge (bug 33361)

Florian Weimer fw@deneb.enyo.de
Fri Sep 12 05:44:04 GMT 2025


* Collin Funk:

> The existing code seems unintentional, since the status would likely
> (certainly?) be overwritten by another call to DL_CALL_FCT. Is that what
> the user experienced?

I assume you mean the service module function, not DL_CALL_FCT (which
just a wrapper for profiling accounting, usually a no-op).

Yes, if the loop iterates once more, than the status gets overwritten,
and the caller (eventually, the application) does not see the ERANGE.


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list