[PATCH v4 3/3] aarch64: Add tests for glibc.cpu.aarch64_bti behaviour
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 11:44:03 GMT 2025
* Yury Khrustalev:
> This is because the modules-names variable is updated in more than one
> place and another place unrelated to my change is not formatted
> correctly. Is it OK of I add the following fix to my patch? Or should I
> post it separately and then rebase my series on top?
>
> diff --git a/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile b/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile
> index c00fe9dc00..d0e4be8829 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile
> +++ b/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile
> @@ -3,16 +3,20 @@ long-double-fcts = yes
> ifeq ($(subdir),elf)
> sysdep-dl-routines += \
> dl-bti \
> - dl-gcs
> + dl-gcs \
> + # sysdep-dl-routines
>
> -tests += tst-audit26 \
> - tst-audit27
> +tests += \
> + tst-audit26 \
> + tst-audit27 \
> + # tests
>
> modules-names += \
> - tst-audit26mod \
> - tst-auditmod26 \
> - tst-audit27mod \
> - tst-auditmod27
> + tst-audit26mod \
> + tst-audit27mod \
> + tst-auditmod26 \
> + tst-auditmod27 \
> + # modules-names
>
> $(objpfx)tst-audit26: $(objpfx)tst-audit26mod.so \
> $(objpfx)tst-auditmod26.so
I think you can commit this sorting fix as obvious and rebase
afterwards.
Thanks,
Florian
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list