[PATCH v4 3/3] aarch64: Add tests for glibc.cpu.aarch64_bti behaviour

Florian Weimer fweimer@redhat.com
Thu Dec 4 11:44:03 GMT 2025


* Yury Khrustalev:

> This is because the modules-names variable is updated in more than one
> place and another place unrelated to my change is not formatted
> correctly. Is it OK of I add the following fix to my patch? Or should I
> post it separately and then rebase my series on top?
>
>   diff --git a/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile b/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile
>   index c00fe9dc00..d0e4be8829 100644
>   --- a/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile
>   +++ b/sysdeps/aarch64/Makefile
>   @@ -3,16 +3,20 @@ long-double-fcts = yes
>    ifeq ($(subdir),elf)
>    sysdep-dl-routines += \
>      dl-bti \
>   -  dl-gcs
>   +  dl-gcs \
>   +  # sysdep-dl-routines
>    
>   -tests += tst-audit26 \
>   -        tst-audit27
>   +tests += \
>   +  tst-audit26 \
>   +  tst-audit27 \
>   +  # tests
>    
>    modules-names += \
>   -    tst-audit26mod \
>   -    tst-auditmod26 \
>   -    tst-audit27mod \
>   -    tst-auditmod27
>   +  tst-audit26mod \
>   +  tst-audit27mod \
>   +  tst-auditmod26 \
>   +  tst-auditmod27 \
>   +  # modules-names
>    
>    $(objpfx)tst-audit26: $(objpfx)tst-audit26mod.so \
>                         $(objpfx)tst-auditmod26.so

I think you can commit this sorting fix as obvious and rebase
afterwards.

Thanks,
Florian



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list