Soft freeze for the upcoming 2.41 release

[H.J. Lu]

On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 6:42 AM Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 8:08 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 7:01 AM Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > I am working on running glibc tests with Clang.  My patches are
> >> > > done.  I am using some patches from
> >> > >
> >> > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/azanella/clang
> >> > >
> >> > > I have total of 39 patches plus:
> >> > >
> >> > > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20241217071836.2309110-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com/
> >> > >
> >> > > Many of my patches are independent of each other,
> >> > > but "Add clang specific warnings suppress macros":
> >> > >
> >> > > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20241221222300.753331-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com/
> >> > >
> >> > > is used by other patches.
> >> > >
> >> > > Should I send out my patches as a set?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > It's a logical group and this way we better keep track of it, so I think it makes sense.
> >> > Sam also already asked me about them for 2.41 - in my opinion no problem with the
> >> > corresponding reviews, as long as from now on we "just finish what we started".
> >>
> >> The "Compile glibc tests with Clang" patch set is at:
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=42272
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >
> > All my Clang test patches have been committed.  But "make check" with
> > Clang 19 will fail without:
> >
> > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20241217071836.2309110-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com/
>
> There are two patches:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32465#c1.

Thanks to everyone, especially Sam.   All Clang related patches have
been committed.   I submitted a NEWS patch:

https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2024-December/163086.html

-- 
H.J.