Soft freeze for the upcoming 2.41 release

[Sam James]

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 8:08 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 7:01 AM Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > I am working on running glibc tests with Clang.  My patches are
>> > > done.  I am using some patches from
>> > >
>> > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/azanella/clang
>> > >
>> > > I have total of 39 patches plus:
>> > >
>> > > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20241217071836.2309110-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com/
>> > >
>> > > Many of my patches are independent of each other,
>> > > but "Add clang specific warnings suppress macros":
>> > >
>> > > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20241221222300.753331-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com/
>> > >
>> > > is used by other patches.
>> > >
>> > > Should I send out my patches as a set?
>> > >
>> >
>> > It's a logical group and this way we better keep track of it, so I think it makes sense.
>> > Sam also already asked me about them for 2.41 - in my opinion no problem with the
>> > corresponding reviews, as long as from now on we "just finish what we started".
>>
>> The "Compile glibc tests with Clang" patch set is at:
>>
>> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/list/?series=42272
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> All my Clang test patches have been committed.  But "make check" with
> Clang 19 will fail without:
>
> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/glibc/patch/20241217071836.2309110-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com/

There are two patches:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32465#c1.