[PATCH 0/4] Restartable Sequences support for glibc 2.30

[Florian Weimer]

* Carlos O'Donell:

> On 3/22/19 1:39 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>> 
>>> The only point that still appears to not reach concensus is whether it's
>>> acceptable to define the RSEQ_SIG code signature for each architecture.
>>> If I missed other points that failed to reach concensus, please let me
>>> know!
>> 
>> I still think the registration mechanism is very problematic and
>> should be avoided.
>
> The *entire* registration mechanism?

The reference-counting part.  It's going to be of limited use, for a
few years at most, and we'll have to carry it forward indefinitely.
I don't think it's worth the complexity.