[PATCH 0/4] Restartable Sequences support for glibc 2.30

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 3/22/19 1:39 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
> 
>> The only point that still appears to not reach concensus is whether it's
>> acceptable to define the RSEQ_SIG code signature for each architecture.
>> If I missed other points that failed to reach concensus, please let me
>> know!
> 
> I still think the registration mechanism is very problematic and
> should be avoided.

The *entire* registration mechanism?

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.