[PATCH] x86: Don't include cacheinfo.c in ld.so
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Wed May 24 07:41:00 GMT 2017
On Mai 23 2017, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since cacheinfo.c isn't used by ld.so,
It isn't? According to librtld.map, it is referenced by
libc_pic.a(memmove.os) (__x86_shared_non_temporal_threshold).
I think the real issue is that ld.so is including the multiarch string
functions.
rtld-string +=strcmp-ssse3.os
rtld-string +=strcmp-sse2-unaligned.os
rtld-string +=memcmp-sse4.os
rtld-string +=memcpy-ssse3.os
rtld-string +=memmove-ssse3.os
rtld-string +=memcpy-ssse3-back.os
rtld-string +=memmove-ssse3-back.os
rtld-string +=memmove-avx512-no-vzeroupper.os
rtld-string +=stpcpy-ssse3.os
rtld-string +=stpcpy-sse2-unaligned.os
rtld-string +=strchr-sse2-no-bsf.os
rtld-string +=memcmp-ssse3.os
rtld-string +=memset-avx512-no-vzeroupper.os
rtld-string +=memmove-avx-unaligned-erms.os
rtld-string +=memmove-avx512-unaligned-erms.os
rtld-string +=memset-avx2-unaligned-erms.os
rtld-string +=memset-avx512-unaligned-erms.os
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list