[PATCH 1/2] nptl: Remove __ASSUME_SET_ROBUST_LIST

[Adhemerval Zanella]

On 20/04/2017 10:47, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 04/20/2017 03:09 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> 
>> But what I am suggesting is exactly to get rid of __ASSUME_SET_ROBUST_LIST to
>> simplify the conditionals and have it defined at runtime instead of having
>> each architecture define whether it supports or not set_robust_list. What you
>> are suggesting is basically current behaviour.
> 
> Right, but I don't think we should do the cleanup yet when we still need run-time checking.

But it does not remove the run-time checking, but rather sets it as the default.
The idea is to continue provide the run-time capabilities and to simplify
the code by removing compilation defines.