[PATCH 1/2] nptl: Remove __ASSUME_SET_ROBUST_LIST

[Florian Weimer]

On 04/20/2017 03:09 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:

> But what I am suggesting is exactly to get rid of __ASSUME_SET_ROBUST_LIST to
> simplify the conditionals and have it defined at runtime instead of having
> each architecture define whether it supports or not set_robust_list. What you
> are suggesting is basically current behaviour.

Right, but I don't think we should do the cleanup yet when we still need 
run-time checking.

Thanks,
Florian