[PATCH v3] getrandom system call wrapper [BZ #17252]

[Florian Weimer]

* Andreas Schwab:

> On Okt 08 2016, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I have no strong preference.  I do agree that using int instead of ssize_t
>> looks like a bug at first glance, but due to the implementation limit, it
>> does not really matter.
>
> If the implementation limit is ever removed then ssize_t remains
> compatible.

Fair enough.  I have asked kernel folks for advice.  Let's see if they
have anything to say on this matter.