[PATCH v3] getrandom system call wrapper [BZ #17252]
Andreas Schwab
schwab@suse.de
Sat Oct 8 10:49:00 GMT 2016
On Okt 08 2016, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> I have no strong preference. I do agree that using int instead of ssize_t
> looks like a bug at first glance, but due to the implementation limit, it
> does not really matter.
If the implementation limit is ever removed then ssize_t remains
compatible.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list