[PATCH v3] getrandom system call wrapper [BZ #17252]

Andreas Schwab schwab@suse.de
Sat Oct 8 10:49:00 GMT 2016


On Okt 08 2016, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:

> I have no strong preference.  I do agree that using int instead of ssize_t
> looks like a bug at first glance, but due to the implementation limit, it
> does not really matter.

If the implementation limit is ever removed then ssize_t remains
compatible.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list