[PATCH 1/3] Optimize trunc() and truncf().

[Mike Frysinger]

On 25 May 2016 15:36, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016, Matt Turner wrote:
> > -  else
> > -    {
> > -      if (j0 == 0x400)
> > -	/* x is inf or NaN.  */
> > -	return x + x;
> > -    }
> 
> You're removing too much code here.  You need to keep this addition in the 
> NaN case to ensure that signaling NaNs raise "invalid" and get converted 
> to quiet NaNs in the process.

does this mean current test coverage is insufficient ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20160525/bb6cf696/attachment.sig>