[PATCH] Revert commit 05a910f7

[Wilco Dijkstra]

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Why do we want to remove  <bits/string2.h>?  Shouldn't inline mempcpy
>>> be there?
>>
>> Currently bits/string2.h is a huge mess without being beneficial (quite a few of
>> the inlines are not useful or even detrimental to performance).
>> Once bits/string2.h is cleaned up and included unconditionally, what's the
>> difference between placing any remaining useful inlines in string2.h or string.h?
>
> Smaller header files? Why did we have string2.h to begin with?

Yes, string2.h is quite huge today, but it won't be when I'm finished with the cleanup.

Wilco