[PATCH] Revert commit 05a910f7

[H.J. Lu]

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:32 AM, Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com> wrote:
>
> H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why do we want to remove  <bits/string2.h>?  Shouldn't inline mempcpy
>> be there?
>
> Currently bits/string2.h is a huge mess without being beneficial (quite a few of
> the inlines are not useful or even detrimental to performance).
> Once bits/string2.h is cleaned up and included unconditionally, what's the
> difference between placing any remaining useful inlines in string2.h or string.h?

Smaller header files? Why did we have string2.h to begin with?



-- 
H.J.