[PATCH 0/2] Tunables for glibc

[H.J. Lu]

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar
<siddhesh@sourceware.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 12:20:11PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> I may have missed something.  Do you include some testcases in your
>> patches?  Does this frame work support static executables? If yes, how
>> does it work with static executables?
>
> I had not tested with static and it looks like it won't work with

In this case, it can't be used for GLIBC_IFUNC since ifunc enable/disable
should work with both dynamic and static executables.

> static executables because the tunables_list won't get initialized.
> I've been verifying with some of the malloc tests that set
> MALLOC_CHECK_ but they're dynamic.  Thanks for catching that, I'll
> send an updated patch.
>
> Siddhesh



-- 
H.J.