[PATCH 0/2] Tunables for glibc

[Siddhesh Poyarekar]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 12:20:11PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> I may have missed something.  Do you include some testcases in your
> patches?  Does this frame work support static executables? If yes, how
> does it work with static executables?

I had not tested with static and it looks like it won't work with
static executables because the tunables_list won't get initialized.
I've been verifying with some of the malloc tests that set
MALLOC_CHECK_ but they're dynamic.  Thanks for catching that, I'll
send an updated patch.

Siddhesh