[PATCH 3/4] Consolidate pread/pread64 implementations

[Adhemerval Zanella]

> Em 8 de jan de 2016, às 19:02, Phil Blundell <pb@pbcl.net> escreveu:
> 
>> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 18:51 -0200, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> I did not say that, what I said is the 'cancellable' syscalls is not a
>> good idea to go in syscalls.list.  You have duplicate logic (the assembly
>> macros) and one need to reimplement function calls in assembly (which 
>> should be handled by C) while taking care of PIC and non-PIC.
> 
> Can't you rework the syscalls.list code to auto-generate C rather than
> assembler for the cancellable cases?
> 
> p.
> 
> 

This is a future work I am planning to do, which also I think is orthogonal of the target I am aiming with these changes (the cancellation rewrite).