[PATCH 3/4] Consolidate pread/pread64 implementations

[Phil Blundell]

On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 18:51 -0200, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> I did not say that, what I said is the 'cancellable' syscalls is not a
> good idea to go in syscalls.list.  You have duplicate logic (the assembly
> macros) and one need to reimplement function calls in assembly (which 
> should be handled by C) while taking care of PIC and non-PIC.

Can't you rework the syscalls.list code to auto-generate C rather than
assembler for the cancellable cases?

p.