argp: modified behaviour for empty group header
Alex Regueiro
alexreg@gmail.com
Thu Jan 8 00:10:00 GMT 2015
Absolutely, but a blank (note: not NULL) line should be respected, instead of ignored, I'd think. There's no reason to include them unless they do something, really. And this additional behaviour would seem useful to me.
> On 8 Jan 2015, at 00:09, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>
> I think the current behavior is what's intended. When there is no group
> header line, the purpose of groups is to change the order of options
> in --help output.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list