[PATCH 2/8] Function declaration cleanup

[Roland McGrath]

> On 08-10-2014 18:52, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > This sort of change should get the "no disassembly of compiled code
> > changed" test rather than the vanilla "no regressions" test.  With that
> > testing, changes like this can count as "obvious enough".
> >
> Thanks, I compared the dissassembly of compiled code and it shows no change.
> Is that ok to apply?

Yes.  What I meant to communicate is that whenever you have a
prototypification change, just verifying that it doesn't change the
compiled code is enough to commit it without explicit approval from
another person.  (Of course it never hurts to let people look it over for
typos or bad indentation or whatever, but when you're confident you got
those trivia correct, you can just commit without waiting for replies.)


Thanks,
Roland