[PATCH 2/8] Function declaration cleanup

Adhemerval Zanella azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Oct 9 14:41:00 GMT 2014


On 08-10-2014 18:52, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This sort of change should get the "no disassembly of compiled code
> changed" test rather than the vanilla "no regressions" test.  With that
> testing, changes like this can count as "obvious enough".
>
Thanks, I compared the dissassembly of compiled code and it shows no change.
Is that ok to apply?



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list