Wiki discussion of standards conformance issues

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 01/29/2014 05:37 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> I've added a section 
> <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Development_Todo/Master#Standards_conformance> 
> to the wiki todo list discussing standards conformance issues in glibc.
> 
> Does anyone have comments on the question of marking conformance bugs in 
> Bugzilla (my suggestion is keywords std-c90, std-posix2008, etc., 
> indicating that a bug is related to conformance to a given standard - not 
> necessarily that it's a conformance bug, as it might relate to a missing 
> optional feature)?
> 
> Where the wiki page list links to a past discussion, which in turn links 
> to other past discussions, it would be useful it someone could extract all 
> the possibly-not-fully-resolved conformance-related issues from those 
> discussions and ensure they go in appropriately tagged Bugzilla bugs or on 
> the wiki page (items where it still needs to be worked out whether there 
> is a current problem could also go on the wiki page).

Having bugs in the bugzilla for conformance bugs, appropriately marked
with agreed upon keyword, sounds good to me.

Any new bugs I file that are conformance related I'll mark with a new
keyword (after adding such a keyword to bugzilla).

Are there any keywords you'd like me to add?

Cheers,
Carlos.