Wiki discussion of standards conformance issues

[Joseph S. Myers]

I've added a section 
<https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Development_Todo/Master#Standards_conformance> 
to the wiki todo list discussing standards conformance issues in glibc.

Does anyone have comments on the question of marking conformance bugs in 
Bugzilla (my suggestion is keywords std-c90, std-posix2008, etc., 
indicating that a bug is related to conformance to a given standard - not 
necessarily that it's a conformance bug, as it might relate to a missing 
optional feature)?

Where the wiki page list links to a past discussion, which in turn links 
to other past discussions, it would be useful it someone could extract all 
the possibly-not-fully-resolved conformance-related issues from those 
discussions and ensure they go in appropriately tagged Bugzilla bugs or on 
the wiki page (items where it still needs to be worked out whether there 
is a current problem could also go on the wiki page).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com