[patch] Adjust AT_EXECFN on explicit loader invocation
Paul Pluzhnikov
ppluzhnikov@google.com
Mon Nov 18 22:45:00 GMT 2013
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote:
> This is quite confusing when stack grows up, a this part will skip a
> AT_NULL auxval
I don't believe that's true. AFAIU, there will still be a NULL entry
between the last envp and the auxv[].
However, I don't have any machines that use strack grows up, so I can't test it.
> and what happens if there is no AT_EXECFN?
The test would fail. Are there any kernels on which glibc works, which
have aux vector, and which do not put AT_EXECFN into it?
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list