[PING][PATCH v2] Use __glibc_(un)likely instead __builtin_expect.

[Ondřej Bílka]

ping
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:49:11AM +0100, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:48:43PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 12:01:31AM +0200, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Now I return to one of todo-list issues which is using glibc-likely/unlikely.
> > > 
> > > First comes a easy case which can be expressed as following script.
> > > 
> > > cat $1 | sed -e "s/if (__builtin_expect (\(.*\), 0))/if (__glibc_unlikely (\1))/" | sed -e "s/if (__builtin_expect (\(.*\), 1))/if (__glibc_likely (\1))/"
> > > 
> > 
> > Based on Roland's comment, I did some automated verification of the
> > patch.  I found the following problems:
> > 
> > 1. Changes in whitespace in macro definitions
> > 2. Changes in whitespace in malloc routines
> > 
> > Could you fix these and repost?
> >
> I reposted patch but sourceware thinks its spam,
> 
> To avoid that use following link:
> 
> http://kam.mff.cuni.cz/~ondra/libc_likely.patch
>