[PATCH] Enhance fphex test

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 10:45 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> What's up with test cases that don't have licenses?
>
> I think it's just past carelessness, or perhaps past (unstated) decisions
> that it didn't matter.  (The clear right to distribute them matters, but
> the actual license doesn't really.)

The copyright holder, in this case the FSF, has the right to distribute?

I assume you are saying the license doesn't matter because you don't
believe the tests have value outside of glibc?

>> Should they?
>
> I suppose.  Clarity there doesn't matter so much, since they don't wind up
> in binaries people distribute and so it won't ever impinge on the millions
> of users out there.  The standard copyright header doesn't make too much
> sense, since LGPL for something not a library is moderately nonsensical.
> A GPL >= 2 header is presumably fine.

My feeling is that these tests have value and therefore should be
licensed accordingly.

I agree that a GPL >= 2 header is good.

Does anyone else have any comments?

Cheers,
Carlos.