Require binutils 2.20 or later to build glibc
Thomas Schwinge
thomas@codesourcery.com
Mon Feb 27 13:34:00 GMT 2012
Hi!
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:16:23 +0000, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> That makes it powerpc, s390 and sh we haven't heard from the maintainers
> of. I've CC:ed those maintainers; could you comment on whether requiring
> binutils 2.20 or later is OK for your architecture?
OK for SH (unless Kaz puts in a veto); I'm currently testing with
something 2.21-ish as well as CVS HEAD.
Also OK for GNU Hurd on x86.
Grüße,
Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20120227/c8feb513/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list