PATCH: Spell exp2l correctly

[Mark Mitchell]

Roland McGrath wrote:
> Hmm, we need to figure out what configurations (if any) were using the old
> bogus definition before.  Those haven't had exp2l in the GLIBC_2.1 version
> set heretofore.  For new applications that link against exp2l, we want that
> to hit a new version set if the existing GLIBC_2.1 version set doesn't
> contain exp2l.  

I'm afraid I'm not knowledgeable enough to help with that; I don't 
understand well enough all the ways in which GLIBC has been built and 
deployed.  The exp2l function is listed in libm.abilist, but the (bogus) 
expl2 does not appear.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304