PATCH: Spell exp2l correctly

Roland McGrath roland@redhat.com
Mon Mar 28 18:51:00 GMT 2005


Hmm, we need to figure out what configurations (if any) were using the old
bogus definition before.  Those haven't had exp2l in the GLIBC_2.1 version
set heretofore.  For new applications that link against exp2l, we want that
to hit a new version set if the existing GLIBC_2.1 version set doesn't
contain exp2l.  



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list