forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

[Ulrich Drepper]

Edward Peschko wrote:

> No, but ease of the build process is definitely on-topic for a developer list - 
> as is the question: why (as per Dan) are 40-odd patches needed to build 
> glibc cleanly? Why aren't they part of the distribution itself?

There are no patches needed to do a build.  Now, if you continue to post 
anything like this, I'll make sure you will not be able to do so in 
future.  Especially with you using your employer's email system.

-- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20050127/1d2c459e/attachment.sig>