static binaries and NSS

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Tue Jun 10 08:40:00 GMT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thorsten Kukuk wrote:

> I think it is time that we add a linker warning to getpwnam and
> friends, that static linking and using this functions, which calls
> NSS, is a bad idea.

That's certainly a good thing to do regardless of any further action.


> Or should we go one step further and remove
> this functions from the static libc like Solaris did?

I want to take one more look at what is involved.  The problem is
finding the time.  It'll happen hopefully soon.

- -- 
- --------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+5ZlI2ijCOnn/RHQRAkx1AKDFJvXbX/ujRIAmnZHt0FJ/t+XK4QCcC28Y
Nj1mZMwOYcHqnix8+56n66o=
=+eZb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list