static binaries and NSS
Ulrich Drepper
drepper@redhat.com
Tue Jun 10 08:40:00 GMT 2003
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Kukuk wrote:
> I think it is time that we add a linker warning to getpwnam and
> friends, that static linking and using this functions, which calls
> NSS, is a bad idea.
That's certainly a good thing to do regardless of any further action.
> Or should we go one step further and remove
> this functions from the static libc like Solaris did?
I want to take one more look at what is involved. The problem is
finding the time. It'll happen hopefully soon.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+5ZlI2ijCOnn/RHQRAkx1AKDFJvXbX/ujRIAmnZHt0FJ/t+XK4QCcC28Y
Nj1mZMwOYcHqnix8+56n66o=
=+eZb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list