static binaries and NSS
Thorsten Kukuk
kukuk@suse.de
Tue Jun 10 08:30:00 GMT 2003
Hi,
I get more and more complains from ISVs, who linked their binaries
static against glibc, that the binaries stop working with a glibc
update. The reason for linking the binaries static is always, that
they think in this way they are independend of the installed glibc.
I think it is time that we add a linker warning to getpwnam and
friends, that static linking and using this functions, which calls
NSS, is a bad idea. Or should we go one step further and remove
this functions from the static libc like Solaris did?
Comments?
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/ kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE 2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list