linuxconf complexity

Jack Howarth howarth@bromo.med.uc.edu
Mon Nov 2 13:45:00 GMT 1998


On Nov 2,  1:20pm, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> 
> What I do not understand is why it should have worked for any 2.0.*
> release.  I tested it with the 2.0.5 I have here and it didn't work.

Ulrich,
   That still doesn't answer the question. Is it logical to assume
symbols should export backwards even when the dynamic libraries are
associated via a link rather than a dlopen? If we disallow that
behavior we risk breaking software other than linuxconf (although
I can think of another case at the moment). However as a matter
of programming technique it would be nice to know if we currently are
too strict with our handling of dynamic libraries.
         Jack


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jack W. Howarth, Ph.D.                                     231 Bethesda Avenue
NMR Facility Director                              Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0524
Dept. of Molecular Genetics                              phone: (513) 558-4420
Univ. of Cincinnati College of Medicine                    fax: (513) 558-8474



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list