__stat: should it end up as UND in libc.so or not?

[Franz Sirl]

At 17:33 11.12.98 , Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:
>
>> It must be a PPC bug in glibc since __stat is never defined for
>> libc.so. I didn't find any reference to __stat in libc, at least
>> not on x86.
>
>Well, it could also be a remaining bug in the libc.
>
>We were careful to use in the libc code explicit calls to __xstat
>instead of __stat or use a macro __stat to allow compiling without
>optimization.  Please find out which file this comes from and make
>sure it is either a __xstat call or the header with the __stat
>definition is used.

Hmm, one candidate was dirent/opendir.os (sysdeps/unix/opendir.c) AFAI
remember. This one includes <sys/stat.h> and uses __stat. It should use
__xstat here? These are actually quite easy to find, compile glibc with -O0
and then use find -name "*.os"|xargs objdump|less

I'm off for the weekend, but I will come up with a patch on late sunday if
that's the right thing to do.

Franz.