__stat: should it end up as UND in libc.so or not?

[Ulrich Drepper]

hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:

> It must be a PPC bug in glibc since __stat is never defined for
> libc.so. I didn't find any reference to __stat in libc, at least
> not on x86.

Well, it could also be a remaining bug in the libc.

We were careful to use in the libc code explicit calls to __xstat
instead of __stat or use a macro __stat to allow compiling without
optimization.  Please find out which file this comes from and make
sure it is either a __xstat call or the header with the __stat
definition is used.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com   `------------------------