[Bug libc/26275] abort(3) is not signal-safe

carlos at redhat dot com sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Wed Jun 19 11:58:27 GMT 2024


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26275

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-06-19
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #6 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
I have not been able to make abort AS-safe easily.

And now I have need for it, in reviewing the asynchronous cancellation fixes we
can now detect undefined behaviour easily in the signal handler via a PC check
and we *should* abort the process in the handler.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the Glibc-bugs mailing list