[Bug libc/27143] New: Calling `system("-some-tool")` fails (although it is a valid `sh` command)
ciprian.craciun at gmail dot com
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Sun Jan 3 17:30:07 GMT 2021
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27143
Bug ID: 27143
Summary: Calling `system("-some-tool")` fails (although it is a
valid `sh` command)
Product: glibc
Version: 2.32
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libc
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: ciprian.craciun at gmail dot com
CC: drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
As the subject states, the `system` function fails when calling it with a
command that starts with a hyphen, which is an accepted executable name, and an
accepted `sh` command.
Let's assume one has an executable starting with a hyphen, as in:
~~~~
ln -s -T /usr/bin/echo ~/.bin/-echo
~~~~
Assuming that `~/.bin` is in `$PATH` the following work in "plain" `sh` /
`bash`:
~~~~
type -P -- -echo
which -- -echo
-echo a b
~~~~
However the following simple `main.c` doesn't work:
~~~~
> cat ./main.c
main() { system("-echo a b"); }
> gcc -o ./main ./main.c
> ./main
sh: - : invalid option
~~~~
The issue is simple:
* `system("-echo a b")` end's up calling `sh -c '-echo a b'`;
* unfortunately the `-c` argument states that it will use as a command the
**first non-option argument** which in this case there is none as `-echo a b`
is mistaken as an option argument;
The solution would be updating `system` to issue `sh -c -- {command}`, as in
(taking the manual as example):
~~~~
execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", "--", command, (char *) NULL);
^^^^ this is added
~~~~
However this proposed solution might break systems where `sh` doesn't accept
the `--` separator. (Is this the case?)
An alternative would be, if the command starts with a hyphen then a space could
be added at the beginning, as in: `sh -c ' -echo a b'`
My environment:
* `sh --version` -- `GNU bash, version 5.0.18(1)-release
(x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)`;
* `getconf --version` -- `getconf (GNU libc) 2.32`
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Glibc-bugs
mailing list