Fwd: Maintainer policy for GDB

[Jim Blandy]

On 11/17/05, Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/05, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> > I'm not concerned by this.  It would be a pretty rude thing to do.  If
> > it happens once, we can handle that going up to the SC; if it happens
> > repeatedly, we can either clarify the reversion policy or censure the
> > maintainers involved, depending on the situation.
> >
> > I absolutely don't want a voting system involved in this process.
>
> There's no harm in giving it a try.

This was ambiguous.  I don't see any harm in trying things out as you
suggest.  If the SC ends up being called on too often, then we can
revisit things.