Fwd: Maintainer policy for GDB

[Jim Blandy]

On 11/17/05, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
> I'm not concerned by this.  It would be a pretty rude thing to do.  If
> it happens once, we can handle that going up to the SC; if it happens
> repeatedly, we can either clarify the reversion policy or censure the
> maintainers involved, depending on the situation.
>
> I absolutely don't want a voting system involved in this process.

There's no harm in giving it a try.