sim: Handle and pass new required option -OPC for CGEN "desc".

Hans-Peter Nilsson hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com
Wed Dec 1 15:02:00 GMT 2004


> Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 08:53:40 -0500
> From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>

> Testsuites for "check-sim" are quite rare.  The way one normally
> obtains confidence in regenerated simulators is by running the
> gcc/gdb tests against the changed sim.

A *very* weak confidence, and a roundabout way of doing it at
that!  I just want to raise a concern: I hope it isn't policy.

(I like test-suites, and ones exercising existing-code coverage,
functional coverage and fixed bugs is a minimum.  I could
rewrite the whole thing and not worry -- except of course to
check that the new code paths are covered!)  Besides, i960 is
obsoleted, removed from gcc, so no hope in current CVS for that.

> Thanks for your care & feeding of cgen.  (I'll get back to
> you on the other cris stuff later today.)

So they all say. :-)  I'd be most thankful to get that SID issue
resolved.  What are y'all using for CGEN debugging?  I tried
psd-1.2.1 but it doesn't seem guile-compatible.

brgds, H-P



More information about the Gdb mailing list